A measurement you can replicate, check, and testify to in your own words.
For computer scientists and forensic experts retained in AI copyright matters. IPLYR supplies extraction testing and the full record behind it. The opinion is yours.
- → The complete record: prompts, settings and model responses
- → Reproducible end to end, by you or by the opposing expert
- → Error-rate status stated in every report, never assumed
- → Limitations written out for use in your report
- → Grounded in published extraction and membership-inference research
Why replication matters
An expert who relies on a tool they cannot check is exposed on cross-examination. IPLYR's output is meant to be re-run, so an opinion rests on a measurement the expert has verified independently.
What a challenge usually targets
Extraction evidence is typically attacked on how many attempts were made, what counted as a match, and whether a similar rate would appear on text the model never saw. Reports are written with those challenges in mind and say plainly where a question remains open.
Working together
IPLYR is open to expert-witness collaborations. Write to hello@iplyr.com with a short note on your background and the kind of matters you take.
More detail: methodology and limits · frequently asked questions